Autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Did you mean user domain. I also agree to receive email newsletters, account updates, notifications and communications from other profiles, sent by germanydating.

A must-read for English-speaking expatriates and internationals across Europe, Expatica provides a tailored local news service and essential information on living, working, and moving to your country of choice. With in-depth features, Expatica brings the international community closer together.

Amongst other services, Expatica offers the best dating site for Expats in Germany since Finding love is a challenging quest even in your home country. Dating in Germany will either make it more so or raise the chance to finally get the partner you’ve been looking for all along. Dating for expats info. Living in Germany is an incredible opportunity to rediscover and reinvent yourself, including the romantic side of your life.

Transcending cultural differences and customs is just a small step to achieve that. Online Dating Guide. No matter who you ask, you will get the same answer: dating nowadays is hard.

Now try inserting host objects. It will not know where to start and stop them. Sometimes it will work as intuitively expected, sometimes it uses a bounding box interpretation, and sometimes, well, who knows.

Ever opened up a complex Revit family and given up on life? After creating a constraint, if the element is not selected, the constraint is also invisible. Constraints are usually the most important thing of a family, as it defines the geometric relationships, yet it is only discoverable if you know where to look.

Sometimes, Revit will happily delete a constraint for you, but not tell you where or what or exactly why. Instead you have to play peek-a-boo with constraints that may have been forcefully deleted by Revit when you try to do some unrelated transformation and try to reverse engineer how a family works.

Create text box. Make it an ordered list. Increment the list. Press enter twice. Create a new list. Now you can no longer increment lists!

You broke Revit! Since , Revit users have wanted to dimension to the midpoint of a line. In real life, if you demolish a door, you are left with a structural opening where the door used to exist. In Revit land, since , if you demolish a door, that opening is magically filled up with an infill wall. This infill wall has no phasing settings, cannot have an opening placed in it, inherits all of the properties of its surrounding existing wall, yet shows in a new construction plan as a new wall.

What should happen is the opening should remain, and you should explicitly have to create a new infill object, so that you can quantify it as part of the building works. Any BIM modeling program has the concept of relationships between elements. For instance, in IFC, a building storey must belong in a building. If you demolish the building, by extension, the building storey is also demolished. In Revit, this is the same: walls must belong to a level unless you come across that issue with curtain walls where they can disassociate themselves with deleted levels and just float in space.

This means that if you delete a level, all elements on that level are also deleted. This is known as a tree, graph, or hierarchical structure, where elements depend on one another.

What is not good is that Revit does not acknowledge that elements have relationships. It will scold you in a warning and happily delete or ungroup objects to fix a broken graph, but it will never actually allow you to view this relationship. For instance, you cannot select all elements that are part of a level.

You cannot select all elements that have a constraint or working plane that derives from another object. If you select a tag, you cannot select the element that is being tagged.

The result is that people become scared to perform graph-breaking operations like ungrouping objects because they cannot be fixed in Revit. People are hesitant to delete levels, or just sigh when dimensions drop off.

The section box is really hard to control when in perspective views since it generally goes out to infinity. The workaround is the adjust it in parallel view, and then switch to perspective view. The crop box also loses its scale and position, so you end up getting lost in space. Revit manages to be spectacularly bad at both 2D and 3D.

The end result? Revit will barely support LOD in a large project, but the added geometry and the inability to manage external documents as mentioned before will cause Revit to be unable to scale to LOD It might go on a small project, but not further than that. Unfortunately, its object types and object instances which so clearly mirror the software concept of classes and objects, do not use the full potential of OO.

This is unlike IFC, which specifies object typing. Surface normals on masses are very important because they determine the wall orientation when you do wall-by-face to create complex geometries.

If you want to do a wall with finishes and substructure that align to a datum, you need to make sure your normals are all facing the same way. This means you often need to create two versions of walls – one front-face, and one back-face, and use trial and error to work out which one goes where.

If you are doing a custom shape, Revit does not offer any tools to check planarity. This usually means that fabricators cannot set out, nor actually construct the funky shape you have drawn. Revit will happily distort hatches and other 3D elements to fit.

This means that project-specific data is inlined into the project files, and non-project specific data is referenced from an external, linked library, so it can be reused and seen as a source of truth for many projects. So you are unable to link in families or project settings. This means that every single project essentially duplicates every single company asset that it needs. Not only is this inefficient, it means it is difficult to propagate changes across the company.

If we improve an asset, we cannot easily roll it out to every project. It also encourages project members to make changes locally and not share their improvements to the rest of the company.

Why would you ever do such a thing? Add an image into a Revit project. Now delete it. Is it gone? Manage Images dialog back into your file? Even though it stores a path to show the source, can it detect duplicate sources?

Unlike IFC, where you can happily connect external resources to elements, such as supporting product documentation and brochures, or external databases and schedules, Revit does not support any such thing.

Instead, people rely on using third-party plugins, such as dRofus. This is odd, because dRofus supports IFC. If you want a view template to apply to multiple types of plans, such as floor plans and area plans, the colourschemes will only work for one or the other.

This means you need to do a manual setting, or create two view templates. Profiles are pink. Specifically, they are FF00FF. Errors are orange, or FF This provides a WCAG contrast ratio of 1.

In practice, this means that it is really hard to spot where the mistakes are when you draw an incorrect profile. This makes it really hard to even see what you have selected. Architectural convention states that a plan is essentially a horizontal section – a boolean operation that displays what is in front of the cutting plane, and whatever is behind it is not shown, or when relevant, shown in a different visual representation e.

Lines further than a certain threshold in the distance may be shown in a lighter or faded representation to show that it is far into the background. An even more bizarre example is where a Revit floor will disregard your view depth and show anyway , as long as it is within an arbitrarily picked range of 4 feet of your bottom clip. Stairs also have their own cutting plane and view range rules , which become especially confusing when you create your own in-place stair model, or even convert that in-place model into a stair family.

Furniture families also ignore the cutting plane. There are also no ways to change the rules for cutting, which results in people doing hacks like invisible geometry to be cut , or placing objects with certain offsets. In Revit, by default, all doors need a wall to be hosted in. In order to do this in Revit you need to trick it by creating a generic model, and then changing the category to door.

It may or may not show up in your door schedule, though. Unfortunately, Revit does not allow you to assign a construction phase in a wall opening. An unsemantic workaround is to create a void family. The IFC spec supports element relationships, where elements can be related to one another. A common usecase for this is doors, where a door goes to a space, and from another space. You can work around it, using custom parameters, API calls, and Dynamo scripts, but fundamentally Revit does not make it easy to expose element relationships.

Certain families are considered to be special for whatever Autodesk reason, and cannot be created in the traditional family way. They can only be created as an in-place model. Some Revit users have been taught that in-place models are always bad, and therefore will resort to misclassification of BIM elements instead of actually building the object properly. Even if an in-place model is used, it is difficult to propagate, and if it uses openings, it is very difficult to copy around the project, and you cannot create instances of it.

A little known fact is that roofs also do this. An even lesser known fact is that a roof things that above is interior, and below is exterior. For roofs with complex layered families, or by face, or curtain walls, this symptom will show and you will then have to basically draw an upside down roof.

Given that metal profiled sheet roofs are absolutely everywhere in construction, it is surprising how hard it is to draw in Revit. This suggests that the renderer used for views and sheets are different, and may account for inconsistent visuals between the two. This is not an easily replicated one but does occur, especially in 3D views where you are constantly changing section boxes and orbiting.

A strange occurance might be where a large link does not show up in a section or elevation. Ever tried nesting a structural family? What if you need a repeatable structural bay?

Sort of. Turns out you can do it, but there is an obscure workaround to trick Revit where you create a solid in-place generic model, then cut the curtain panel using that, then hide the generic model either using view element overrides, a visibility boolean parameter in the generic model, or by hiding it in another workset. Autodesk has disabled the boolean parameter trick in more recent versions of Autodesk in an attempt to stop us from doing this for some reason, but the workset trick still works.

Rooms in sections display shape handles allowing you to drag and drop them to define their vertical extends. In my opinion, Revit allows a bit too much flexibility with carefree dragging and dropping, and this is a frequent source of inaccuracy when people try to eyeball things. When dragging a room, the extents do not snap to anything, meaning that you have rooms that are just floating willy-nilly. In most text editors since people became too lazy to learn a modal text editor , if you select text and then start typing, it will replace the selected text and enter in new text.

In fact, this behaviour comes out of the box in most GUI toolkits. Autodesk, of course, is special, and requires you to explicitly press backspace or delete before you can type. I will award Revit points get it? You can change the curtain panel family to a door, and that will work in terms of classification as a workaround. However, you cannot place that door into a regular wall, and you also cannot place regular doors into a curtain wall.

Also after the door category workaround it may or may not export to IFC. In fact, this highlights a deeper issue with the misuse of curtain walls. A curtain wall is defined both in IFC and in the English language as an exterior facade that is differentiated from regular walls by its nature of being hung.

In Revit, a curtain wall is whatever you want it to be, including internal glazed partitions, chainwire fences, windows for those too lazy to make a window, and even a roof, because why not. AutoCAD has this great feature where you can print a portion of a drawing based on a selection.

Update: it is somewhat possible by using a scope box as a workaround. If you draw a wall in Revit, that wall has a length associated with it.

If you place a full height door in that wall, what do you think happens to the wall length? Will it decrease and minus the width of the door, or will it remain the same? Turns out it will stay the same and ignore your door. This means if a quantity surveyor costs your model, they will count extra wall and cost incorrectly. So what happens if you export your model to IFC? If you do happen to check the boxes to export quantities and Revit properties, then things improve a little, but not much better.

In this scenario, Revit will export two length properties – one as a custom Revit property set which is the double counted wall which is a wrong number anyway, and another in the IFC quantities properties, which is actually the net length: the correct value.

This misnaming of quantities is common in Revit. Revit only calculates Net, but places it in the Gross field. Given that Revit has no ability to audit quantities so architects blindly give QSes garbage model data means that QSes either resort to 2D drawings, or counting things manually, which gets a little bit prohibitive on large, complex projects. Wireframe mode lets you see through objects to spot things that are obscured.

This is great when you have complex geometry. However if your slab have sub elements e. Colourschemes are useful to colour in rooms or areas by their properties.

On occasion, you might want to produce one for a reflected ceiling plan. Revit does not allow you to apply a colourscheme to an RCP. There is a filter-based work around if you want to colour by height, but otherwise you need to resort to overlaying two plans. Neither of which are nice solutions. This side effect is that everybody downloads some random third party PDF printing driver all of which have their subtle problems and rendering issues.

When things fail to print, people try and solve it by using another driver and trying their luck. This causes drawings to be inconsistent graphically and exhibit random rendering errors. Insulation is a fuzzy thing that moves here and there and in commercial construction can weave between studs or sag between safety meshes. You can use a multi-category tag instead, but why should you need to? This file stores your parameters in a text file on the filesystem independent from your project.

This is a problem in a large company where different design sectors or different design groups have different shared parameter files. Plan regions are simply completely messed up in Revit. The idea is simple: create a zone in your floor plan or RCP with a different cutting plane, foreground clip and background clip.

If you have site topography, Revit plan regions will not affect topography. Sometimes, the plan region may or may not work depending on whether it is some arbitrary distance away from your object. You may need to move the plan region to create a buffer zone away from your object to work , or even just randomly move the plan region away from the object.

Why this is the case, oh, who knows. Most floors in real life are sloped. They slope so that water can drain, they slope to get from one level to another, and they slope because the Earth itself slopes. To build things, we need to mark elevations and levels. This is especially important when the RLs change. This is literally the scenario when it is most vital to know the level. You will have to manually interpolate and put fake text level annotations on your plans.

 
 

Database and Services migration to Revit. – Revit Forum

 

Did you mean user domain. I also agree to receive email newsletters, account updates, notifications and communications from other profiles, sent by germanydating. A must-read for English-speaking expatriates and internationals across Europe, Expatica provides a tailored local news service and essential information on living, working, and moving to your country of choice. With in-depth features, Expatica brings the international community closer together. Amongst other autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free, Expatica offers the best dating site for Expats in Germany since Finding love is a challenging freee even in your home country.

Dating in Germany will either make it more so or raise the chance conifguration finally get the partner you’ve been looking for all along. Dating for expats info. Living in Germany is an incredible opportunity to rediscover and reinvent yourself, including the romantic side of your life. Transcending cultural differences and customs is just a small step to achieve that. Online Dating Guide. No matter who you ask, you will get the same answer: dating nowadays is hard.

For single expats in Germany, dating is even harder. Online Dating. In a perfect world, you and your soulmate would bump into each other on the streets of Germany, lock eyes, and fall madly in love the next second.

Dating Profile. Is online dating easier for single female expats in Germany than for their male counterparts? Dating Tips. Register Login Language: English en. Register to contact people from your country living in Germany just like you! Dating site for Expats in Germany Finding love is a challenging quest even in autodes, home country.

Online dating guide for expats Living in Germany is an incredible opportunity to rediscover and http://replace.me/31537.txt yourself, including the romantic side of your life. Why dating for expats in Germany?

Online Dating Tips for Men vs. Women Is online dating easier for single female expats in Germany than for their male counterparts?

 

[Autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free

 

Revit is shit. Update: The popularity of this article has shown the industry needs to break out of the rfvit behaviour by proprietary vendors, which result in proprietary incompatibilityproprietary obsolescence читать больше, and proprietary subscription. Data about our built environment is a human right autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free should be transparent and not governed by a vendor.

Black-box BIM data is no longer acceptable by companies with a large real-estate portfolio. It is under heavy development, but all early adopters are welcome. Revit is a proprietary software developed by the monopoly Autodesk for the AEC industry. I speak from the perspective of an architect working on large commercial projects across different building typologies, and therefore do not configufation the MEP aspects, which may be better than I have experienced here.

I have a background in software developmentpreviously working as a software architect. Software architects deal with many of the same issues as BIM data management. There are ever-changing client requirements, lots of autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free pieces that interact, and domino effects of changing the design in one area.

I have also used a great deal of software on many platforms, ссылка на продолжение 3D modeling as practiced by the CG industry, point clouds, programmatic typesetting with Lilypond and LaTeX, and am also closely following OpenBIM initiatives. Больше информации this background, I hope to present a fair but critical list нада free windows 10 iso download full version free download Вам issues I have faced with Revit.

Revit has failed to implement even the most basic of BIM concepts: a building. You can categorise walls, floors, roofs … but a building? If you have two buildings next to each other, Revit has no way of saying that some walls belong to building A, and some belong to building B. No way of categorising a shape to represent a building or that some levels are part of building A and some are part of building B. Нажмите сюда a shared site with mix-use buildings where two buildings merge?

In contrast, the first thing that you do when you launch FreeCAD to create a BIM project is to define a building with storeys in that building that belong to a site. Exporting to an IFC? Will your roofs become IfcRoof, or will Revit decide your roof is configurationn slab instead? Will your windows become IfcWindow? Who knows. Revit does what it wants. Will your building element turn up at all? Will it even export? Will it import? Ah, the mysteries of the universe. The simplest IFC of a few kB will take 15 seconds to import and in the process Revit will multiply the filesize by at least Revit will develop a mapping and create a special Revit file just to read and perform the most rudimentary filtering on the IFC autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free.

This creates issues with round-tripping, consultants using our files, and even ourselves trying to use our own files. It also forces us to expose company meep property if we send out Revit files. I am aware of больше на странице able to patch the IFC export type during the export process, and the IFC mapping configuration within Revit itself, as well as the special Ifc override properties, but I should not need to hook into the export process and the mapping process is not reliable.

In most cases, such as in system families, you simply cannot change the autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free. The predicate determining whether or not a building element will be visible in your current view depends on at least 35 different settings. In fact, in their help file they identify certain extremely nefarious ways that can hide things and condone the firing freee any co-worker who commits such a sin.

They have also started a Revit object invisibility hall of fame. Create a roof by footprint. Set it at a certain level. Now if you add a slope to the roof, what RL will the roof edge be at? The answer is nobody knows.

Revit will decide to pivot the roof wherever it wants and your edge will be a shitty RL that the builder will ignore. If you create autkdesk rectangular ceiling sketch at a particular level, define a slope going from one edge to another. Which ссылка на страницу will stay at the devit level, and which edge will slope up or down? So in practice, you have no idea where your ceiling is going to slope, and you need to move it around by trial and error.

This is still broken even if you explicitly draw a slope arrow and say that the head or tail is at a specific level. Revit will totally ignore whatever value you put there and do whatever it wants. Revit knows best. Before I complain fabricatiob this one, I would state that walls and joints are a very hard problem.

Walls are layered, and has many rules on what takes precedence in a joint, both in a plan and in a section, and Autodesk has made an attempt to cater for this. Unfortunately in practice, we have walls which are too eager to intelligently snap, walls in groups who must be unjoined to prevent Revit errors, the inability to dimension to the core of a wall which is how people build walls, go figurecurved walls and sharp angles in funky facades that encounter strange junctions, and so on.

According to the IFC definition and to common sensea lining on a furring channel, and a block wall should be 1 wall, not 2. The fundamental problem is that Revit has only implemented three types of walls: the system family wall a IfcWallStandardCasewhich is an читать далее axis with material autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free, a curtain wall which is misusedand an in-place wall corresponding to a catchall IfcWall.

Notably missing is the IfcElementedCaseWallfor scenarios where walls are made up of different elements like studs, channels, insulation, and lining but are assembled together into a single wall. If Revit allowed you to define walls as a sum of parts, it would be more flexible and still semantically correct. Revit also does not implement things that are purely imperual i.

This means that people draw bump rails, skirting, and moulding as railings or walls, draw slab insulation as floors, and of autpdesk, draw cladding as walls. This is wrong. They have different joining rules, and things like fire, acoustics, and thermal apply differently.

They are a different cost item. Yet they are all lumped in the same basket. Are you tagging an elevation? Will any of your tags line up horizontally or vertically? Will any of your tags be equally spaced between grids or building elements? No, of course not. Revit hates you and wants you to eyeball all your annotation positions. Except, strangely, when you use a leader confighration your tags.

But not to fear! There is a free addon which will allow you to align objects called BIMAlign. This is good. In practice, however, CAD links do not work reliably.

From the inability to share coordinates, having missing geometry, lagging of the Revit file, hatch patterns going haywire, and geometry fabriication of extents errors. These problems do not exhibit themselves in simple vanilla CAD files, but are very common in complex projects. This means CAD files have to undergo a cleanup process where we purge, delete, explode, and sometimes copy and paste into a blank file to start again.

Instead, you can draw lines manually. That is, unless you create a fake table and put data in the header. From a reader comment, I should note that it is possible to overcome farication with various Revit plugins that allow you to link data from spreadsheets.

A family-created, wall-hosted door does not change the room bounding property of its host wall. An in-place door, will not. This is in contrast to the IFC specification which explicitly explains about the scenario of doors in walls:. The wall represents a vertical construction that bounds or subdivides spaces.

A wall may have openings, such as wall openings, openings used for windows or doors, or niches and recesses. In Revit world, all walls are completely vertical. Modeling anything more complex than that requires proxy construction objects. Usually view templates should override the view autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free if the include checkbox is checked.

This is even if you disable the scope box. It only starts working as expected if you uncheck the include checkbox, manually fix the north orientation setting, then re-check the checkbox. Go figure. Did you ever want to specify an Omniclass download true image home 2011 iso cd free download for an object?

Revit is especially harsh towards IFC classifications, and in fact makes it completely invisible in the interface, but has a separately documented feature where certain ocnfiguration parameters have magic effects autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free IFC classifications.

So without knowing exactly autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free you узнать больше, your IFC classifications could well be nonsense. Autodesk wants you to buy the latest version. All the time. If you accidentally open a file with a newer version, it will upgrade, and if you forget to do a save-as, you have now irreversibly broken the compatibility with an older version, and so assets shared autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free the company now cannot be used on older projects.

Are you arduino software free windows 10 creative? Have you changed the line style of a single border autodesk revit 2019 mep fabrication configuration – imperial free a schedule? Once you apply a view template, you will have no way of editing that single border anywhere, unless you disable your view template.

The number one waste in the construction industry as measured by weight which is the preferred metric for the waste industry is masonry. This is unsurprising as Revit does not know confiuration a block wall is. Your best bet is to create a hatch pattern using the archaic pattern syntax, of which people configugation built generators for it online because it is so unintuitive and align it on the surface.